thunt.net

News

Weddings & Beheadings: a banned story by Hanif Kureishi

Hi. I've been laying off the blogging for a few days, waiting for my 15 minutes of fame to die down so I could get back to quoting paragraphs from other sites and posting interesting, humorous, sometimes even non-political stories and videos. With this is mind, I promise to do a wrap-up of my recent fame soon, and I want to do a good job with it and be thorough, (a good man Jeffery, and thorough) but I can't stop blogging until then.

And now without further ado, a story by Hanif Kureishi (author of The Buddha of Suburbia, My Beautiful Laundrette, and more..., who my proffessor buchanan was a big fan of, and was writing some lit crit or a biography about...)

It's an excellent story and it has the added benefit of being banned by the BBC (delayed broadcast... like delayed until never). An act of censorship that the author of this despicable newspaper article agrees with.

Weddings & Beheadings
You've never heard of me, but you've probably seen my work on the television news

by Hanif Kureishi

I have gathered the equipment together and now I am waiting for them to arrive. They will not be long; they never are.

You don’t know me personally. My existence has never crossed your mind. But I would bet you’ve seen my work: it has been broadcast everywhere, on most of the news channels worldwide. Or at least parts of it have. You could find it on the internet, right now, if you really wanted to. If you could bear to look.

Not that you’d notice my style, my artistic signature or anything like that. I film beheadings, which are common in this war-broken city, my childhood home.

It was never my ambition, as a young man who loved cinema, to film such things. Nor was it my wish to do weddings, though there are less of those these days. Ditto graduations and parties. My friends and I have always wanted to make real films, with living actors and dialogue and jokes and music, as we began to do as students. Nothing like that is possible any more. Everyday we are ageing, we feel shabby. The stories are there, waiting to be told; we’re artists. But this stuff, the death work, it has taken over.

We were “recommended” for this employment, and we can’t not do it; we can’t say we’re visiting relatives or working in the cutting room. They call us up with little notice at odd hours, usually at night, and minutes later they are outside with their guns. They put us in the car and cover our heads. Because there’s only one of us working at a time, the thugs help with carrying the gear. But we have to do the sound as well as the picture, and load the camera and work out how to light the scene. I’ve asked to use an assistant, yet they only offer their rough accomplices who know nothing, who can’t even wipe a lens without making a mess of it.

I know three other guys who do this work; we discuss it among ourselves, but we’d never talk to anyone else or we’d end up in front of the camera.

Until recently my closest friend filmed beheadings; however, he’s not a director, only a writer really. I wouldn’t say anything, but I wouldn’t trust him with a camera. He isn’t too sure about the technical stuff, how to set up the equipment, and then how to get the material through the computer and on to the internet. It’s a skill, obviously.

He was the one who had the idea of getting calling cards inscribed with “Weddings and Beheadings” inscribed on them. If the power’s on, we meet in his flat to watch movies on video. When we part, he jokes, “Don’t bury your head in the sand, my friend. Don’t go losing your head now. Chin up!”

A couple of weeks ago he messed up badly. The cameras are good quality, they’re taken from foreign journalists, but a bulb blew in the one light he was using, and he couldn’t replace it. By then they had brought the victim in. My friend tried to tell the men, “It’s too dark, it’s not going to come out and you can’t do another take.” But they were in a hurry, he couldn’t persuade them to wait, they were already hacking through the neck and he was in such a panic he fainted. Luckily the camera was running. It came out underlit, of course—what did they expect? I liked it; Lynchian, I called it, but they hit him around the head, and never used him again.

He was lucky. But I wonder if he’s going mad. Secretly he kept copies of his beheadings and he plays around with them on his computer, cutting and recutting them, putting them to music, swing stuff, opera, jazz, comic songs. Perhaps it’s the only freedom he has.

It might surprise you, but we do get paid; they always give us something “for the trouble.” They even make jokes, “You’ll get a prize for the next one. Don’t you guys love prizes and statuettes and stuff?”

It’s all hellish, the long drive there with the camera and tripod on your lap, the smell of the sack, the guns, and you worry that this time you might be the victim. Usually you’re sick, and then you’re in the building, in the room, setting up, and you hear things from other rooms that make you wonder if life on earth is a good idea.

I know you don’t want too much detail, but it’s serious work taking off someone’s head if you’re not a butcher; and these guys aren’t qualified, they’re just enthusiastic—it’s what they like to do. To make the shot work, it helps to get a clear view of the victim’s eyes just before they’re covered. At the end the guys hold up the head streaming with blood and you might need to use some hand-held here, to catch everything. The shot must be framed carefully. It wouldn’t be good if you missed something.

They cheer and fire off rounds while you’re checking the tape and playing it back. Afterwards, they put the body in a bag and dump it somewhere, before they drive you to another place, where you transfer the material to the computer and send it out.

Often I wonder what this is doing to me. I think of war photographers, who, they say, use the lens to distance themselves from the reality of suffering and death. But those guys have elected to do that work, they believe in it. We are innocent.

One day I’d like to make a proper film, maybe beginning with a beheading, telling the story that leads up to it. It’s the living I’m interested in, but the way things are going I’ll be doing this for a while. Sometimes I wonder if I’m going to go mad, or whether even this escape is denied me.

I better go now. Someone is at the door.

[original source]

An open letter to the Internet regarding the 2008 Presidential Election (Gravel vs. Paul 2008)

Dear Friends on the Internet,

First off, I have no right to call you my friend, as on most sites I am but a lurker, not a participant. But today I end my silence to speak to you about a topic of extreme importance: the 2008 Presidential Election.

With our failure to provide a voting system at least as credible as our banking system (ie: double entry book-keeping and a viable paper trail) it is difficult for anyone who looks at the situation logically to become overly involved in the artificial conversation.

But where there's a will, there's a way. The only way to ensure success for truth-minded people everywhere is to understand that the nominations are more important than the actual elections.

Campaign Mode

I've got primary fever and I think it's time to kick it up a notch around here. I'll be switching thunt.net over into Campaign mode and kicking it off with a very special post that I actually took the time to write myself.

AP: Honeybee die-off threatens food supply

Unless someone or something stops it soon, the mysterious killer that is wiping out many of the nation's honeybees could have a devastating effect on America's dinner plate, perhaps even reducing us to a glorified bread-and-water diet.

Honeybees don't just make honey; they pollinate more than 90 of the tastiest flowering crops we have. Among them: apples, nuts, avocados, soybeans, asparagus, broccoli, celery, squash and cucumbers. And lots of the really sweet and tart stuff, too, including citrus fruit, peaches, kiwi, cherries, blueberries, cranberries, strawberries, cantaloupe and other melons.

In fact, about one-third of the human diet comes from insect-pollinated plants, and the honeybee is responsible for 80 percent of that pollination, according to the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.

Even cattle, which feed on alfalfa, depend on bees. So if the collapse worsens, we could end up being "stuck with grains and water," said Kevin Hackett, the national program leader for USDA's bee and pollination program.

"This is the biggest general threat to our food supply," Hackett said. [link]

Sell out digg, before it's too late

My advice to digg is simple. The next time someone offers you money for your company, sell it.

It doesn't matter what the price is. Just sell and get out before it's too late for you business types.

Before your audience learns the truth.

We don't need you Digg.

You are just a centralized server that a community of users gather around. Without those users you are nothing but an empty shell.

This should be a wake-up call for anyone who still runs a compnay that exists because users store their information on your centralized server. Your days are numbered. Your service is not valuable enough to hold your users information hostage.

We've been through this fight before with Napster. It was a good idea for everyone to share their files, but having a centralized server was a weak implementation. When Gnutella came out, with it's decentralized server, you knew it was all over for the labels. Without a center, Gnutella could not be shut down. Once the information was on the internet it could not help but be spread.

How would Digg be helped by this decentralized strategy? For one thing, these idiotic cease and desist letters wouldn't bother you so much, because with no central location to shutdown it would be impossible for you to comply. Sure you could stop hosting the “digg software” for download, but naturally that job could be done by dozens of mirror sites. You could stop allowing “digg traffic” through your servers, but millions of smaller servers would pop up to handle the load.

Of course I'm just talking about Digg “the idea”, ie: the idea of a democratically controlled website where users vote stories up or down, to decide what makes it to the main page. The company Digg would be thoroughly destroyed by this idea because once the code was free and running on the users own computers instead of your centralized servers, you'd have no ability to add advertising to your content or to redirect the users to time wasting pre-load pages. Simply put there would be no way to monetize digg, so as a company it would cease to exist.

Choose now digg. Are you there to become a company that turns a profit for its shareholders or are you a democratic non-profit service for your users? The choice is yours, but if you choose the latter please sell out like the rest of the Web 2.0 crop of data honey pots. Yahoo Flickr, Yahoo Delicious, Google Blogger, Gootube, Wired Reddit, Fox Myspace, etc. Join the club of former free-websites and become the corporate controlled information censor we all know you want to be. Sell out digg, before it's too late.

Syndicate content