thunt.net

Politics

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because...

I am not here to question the morality or patriotism of my fellow Kossacks. I do not believe that any Kossack intended to argue in favor of ignoring the Constitution's words on impeachment. I do not believe that any Kossack intended to argue in favor of letting George Bush get away with breaking the law (though there were some who said they weren't sure he had...three words: NSA wiretapping program). But they fell into a mental trap whereby they became so focused on their arguments that they forgot the conclusions those arguments were being used to advocate. It's a common mistake, but it has historic ramifications.

So what I'm going to do is show you what their arguments look like when you keep the conclusion in mind. I do this because I feel that future generations are going to want to know why we did our part to support letting this man get away with two full terms in office (we the non-legislators can't impeach him, but we can at least support it). Obviously, I don't expect this diary to be carved into a metallic monument in Washington, DC. But at least I'm doing my little part to keep a record of these days.

And now to the arguments...

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable has unscrupulous motivations.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable diverts people's much-needed attention to getting a Democrat in the White House.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable should have been made long ago, and since it wasn't, it's now most likely useless.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable will play into the media's desire to not focus on things that matter, which impeaching Bush doesn't qualify as.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable means nothing unless you go after other people first.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable isn't realistic.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable won't get enough Republican supporters.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable is being led by someone that people like to make fun of.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable is about dwelling on the past.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable would upset a sizeable portion of Americans who'd rather talk about the bad economy.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable would upset a sizeable portion of Americans who wouldn't like that a President they (allegedly) elected and then (allegedly) re-elected is now facing impeachment.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable wouldn't be as useful as waiting for Barack Obama to maybe become President so he could maybe investigate Bush then.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable would make the Republicans want to illegitimately impeach a future Democratic President, and the warfare between the parties would never end.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable would suck up money that, without a doubt, our Legislative Branch would use to fix our broken infrastructure.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable would suck up time that, without a doubt, our Legislative Branch would use to deal with other issues of importance...time that also can't be split between holding Bush accountable and tackling these issues.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable is only supported by leftwing extremists.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable is really pointless since he's leaving anyway, and what matters is that he's not around to commit any more crimes, not whether or not he committed crimes in the past.

I believe we should let George Bush get away with breaking the law because the attempt to hold him accountable would be used to the advantage of the pro-Bush media.

And that, future generations, is one part of the complex explanation for why George W. Bush was allowed to serve out two full terms...regardless of what he did. [link]

Obama Sellout continues: Wal-Mart Defender To Direct Obama’s Economic Policy

Just days after clinching the Democratic presidential nomination, Senator Obama is naming as his economic policy director an economist who has clashed with critics of Wal-Mart by defending the company as a boon to poor Americans.

The appointment of Jason Furman, 37, a former Clinton administration official who is a visiting scholar at New York University, immediately met with skepticism from some who have faulted Wal-Mart for being stingy toward its workforce.

“It’s surprising because this guy seems to feel that Wal-Mart’s low-wage, low-benefit business model is good for America. That’s just flat-out wrong,” the executive director of Wal-Mart Watch, David Nassar, said. “This guy helped to lend credibility to the Wal-Mart business model. That was disappointing then and it’s disappointing now given this position,” said Mr. Nassar, whose group is backed by a board that includes the president of the Service Employees International Union, Andrew Stern. Mr. Nassar quickly added that he was “not critiquing the Obama campaign.” [link]

"Democratic" London Bans Protesters From Demonstrating Against Bush

London police have announced a ban on anti-war campaigners hoping to protest against President George Bush’s visit to Downing Street this Sunday. The Whitehall ban has been immediately condemned as a “totalitarian act” by the playwright Harold Pinter, while Stop the War organisers are urging people to defy it and to demonstrate nearby in Parliament Square.

“In what is supposed to be a free country the Stop the War Coalition has every right to express its views peacefully and openly. This ban is outrageous and makes the term ‘democracy’ laughable,” Pinter said today.

Lindsey German, a leader of the Stop the War Coalition, said: “It seems that when George W Bush visits this country traditional rights of assembly are to be removed from the people. We are calling on those who care for our democratic rights to come to Parliament Square at 5pm on Sunday 15 June. Some of those who signed statements accusing Bush of war crimes will be leading this protest.

“George Bush has been dictating British foreign policy for many years. Now it appears his security services are determining our rights of protest. This is a disgrace and we will challenge the ban.”

The anti-nuclear campaign CND said it believed the British government was allowing security operations to be directed by White House officials. Previous demonstrations have been allowed along Whitehall, but Bush’s presence in Downing Street - he is due to have dinner with Gordon Brown - means protesters are to be banned from a police ‘exclusion zone’.

Kate Hudson, CND chair, warned that protesters might ignore the police. She said: “Previous attempts to deprive us of our rights to protest have come to nothing. In February 2003 we were told we couldn’t go on the grass in Hyde Park and what happened? Two million people joined us in Hyde Park to oppose the war on Iraq.

“Last October we were told we couldn’t protest in Parliament Square to demand the withdrawal of British troops. What happened then? The morning of the protest we were given the go-ahead. We have a proud record of peaceful democratic protest and we mean to continue - lift the ban now.” [link]

Rep. Dennis Kucinich introduces 35 articles of Impeachment against President George W. Bush

An Ohio Democratic lawmaker and former presidential candidate has presented articles of impeachment against President George W. Bush to Congress.

Thirty-five articles were presented by Rep. Dennis Kucinich to the House of Representatives late Monday evening, airing live on C-SPAN.

"The House is not in order," said Kucinich to Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), upon which Pelosi pounded her gavel.

"Resolved," Kucinich then began, "that President George W. Bush be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate. ...

"In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and to the best of his ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has committed the following abuses of power..."

Video and more at Raw Story